Crist, Inc. v. Whitacre
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion
On Petitions For Rehearing
White, J.
Both appellee and appellants have filed petitions for rehearing. Both allege that our decision contravenes ruling precedent of the Supreme Court. The extent to which that is true, and the reasons therefor, are sufficiently discussed in our initial opinion. Since we remain convinced that those prece*28dents are obsolete, we see no reason to discuss them further. Other grounds for rehearing appear to merit no specific mention. As to rehearing, both petitions are denied.
The appellants’ petition, however, includes the alternative prayer that our mandate be modified…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Hemstock v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crist, Inc. v. WhitacreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970