Legal Opinion

Crist, Inc. v. Whitacre

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 1970No. 169A4PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

On Petitions For Rehearing

White, J.

Both appellee and appellants have filed petitions for rehearing. Both allege that our decision contravenes ruling precedent of the Supreme Court. The extent to which that is true, and the reasons therefor, are sufficiently discussed in our initial opinion. Since we remain convinced that those prece*28dents are obsolete, we see no reason to discuss them further. Other grounds for rehearing appear to merit no specific mention. As to rehearing, both petitions are denied.

The appellants’ petition, however, includes the alternative prayer that our mandate be modified…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hemstock v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crist, Inc. v. WhitacreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API