Legal Opinion
Angell v. Henneberry
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 2, 1992No. 1905, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Chief Judge.
The legal issue before us in this appeal is simple and straightforward. Appellant, Robert Angelí, has been an inmate at Patuxent Institution since August, 1977. 1 In 1990, the authorities at Patuxent decided that he should not remain there any longer and proposed to transfer him to the jurisdiction of the Division of Correction for placement in one of its institutions. Under internal procedures followed by Patuxent and, as we shall hold, under the “due process” clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Angelí is entitled to a hearing to determine whether he should be…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Branch v. McGeeneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Richard Milburn Public Charter Alternative High School v. CafritzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Walker v. Department of Housing & Community DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Patrick v. Secretary, Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- (2001), Maryland Attorney General Reports2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.