Legal Opinion

Dale v. Roosevelt

New York Court of Chancery

Decided August 13, 1822PublishedCited by 13 opinions

ON rehearing, (Vide 5 Johns. Ch. Rep. 174. S. C.)

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

On a rehearing, the cause is en~ tirely open as to the party in whose favour the former decree was given ; and as to the other party, it is open only in respect to the parts of the decree complained of. A party may, no doubt, be let in to read fresh evidence, not read on the former hearing ; but I understand the cases refer to the evidence duly taken in chief, and omitted, by ^ negligence or other cause, to be read j or if the evidence be new matter not before ready, it relates only to papers since found, and which may be proved, viva voce, at the hearing, or to testimony going…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Richmond v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1892
  3. Ross v. New England Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Carlisle v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1870
  5. Adams v. Munter & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API