Chaney v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Justice.
A jury convicted Steven Mark Chaney of murder and assessed his punishment at life imprisonment and a $5,000 fine. In four points of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction and claims that a hearsay statement of the victim, an oral statement of appellant, and testimony regarding extraneous offenses were erroneously admitted by the trial court, thereby creating reversible error. We disagree with these contentions and affirm.
I. INSUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE
A. Standard of Review
Initially, we address appellant’s insufficiency claim. In…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Beardsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ex parte ChaneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Peden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Brenda Lee McCord v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
- Pablo Ponce v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
- Pablo Ponce v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009