Gavin v. Structural Iron Workers Local No. 1
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAIRCHILD, Chief Judge.
In this appeal we are asked to consider whether appellants have adequately stated a claim that they are members, and thus entitled to the “equal rights and privileges” of membership in the defendant local union, as required by the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, 29 U.S.C. § 411. Jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case was based on § 102 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 412, which provides a cause of action for “[a]ny person whose rights . have been infringed by any violation” of the Act. The district court dismissed the appellants’ complaint, however,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henry Hughes v. Local No. 11 of International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Donald Moynahan v. Pari-Mutuel Employees Guild of California, Local 280Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Ferger v. Local 483 of the International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron WorkersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
- Philipchuk v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Ben CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Bullock v. SweeneyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
- Agola v. HagnerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Roosevelt Harris, Leo Pitts, Gloster Harris and Herbert Britt, Plaintiffs v. Plasterers and Cement Masons Local No. 406Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Local Union No. 5741, United Mine Workers of America, Cross v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.