Flach v. Diebold, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER J. ROTHSCHILD, Judge.
Un this workers’ compensation proceeding, the claimant, Mike Flach, appeals the judgment granting the exception of prescription filed by his employer, Diebold, Inc. (“Diebold”). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
FACTS
Mr. Flach contends that on November 5, 2002, he was injured while attempting to repair a night drop box while in the course and scope of his employment with Diebold. On June 21, 2006, he filed a disputed claim for compensation against Diebold. On this form, Mr. Flach alleged that no wage benefits have been paid, his disability status was disputed,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Winford v. Conerly Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Bracken v. Payne and Keller Company, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Frazier v. DELTIDE FISHING & RENTAL TOOLLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.