Legal Opinion
State v. Gronlie
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1973No. Crim. 464, 465PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Two questions have been certified to this court. The trial court has answered the first question No and the second question Y es. The questions follow:
“1) Does the District Court, the sentencing Court, retain jurisdiction in an instance where a Defendant has been sentenced to the State Farm for the purpose of modification, vacation, or suspension of the original sentence ?
“2) Does the State Parole Board have jurisdiction to hear or grant parole to persons who have been sentenced to the State Farm?”
For purposes of background, we quote the pertinent parts of the trial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- John v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Black v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Backman v. GuyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. RuebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Fargo, Cass County v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. BryanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. GlasserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.