Legal Opinion

Estey & Camp v. Luther

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 28, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Petition for writ of prohibition by Estey & Oamp and others against John Luther and others to compel the rescinding of restraining orders and writs of injunction, and to prohibit further interference with the enforcement of a judgment for relators.

1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.

On the 3d day of November, 1898, Estey &• Camp instituted three several suits in a justice of the peace court of Tar-rant county, which were numbered 6,574, 6,575, and 6,576, respectively, upon the docket of said court, in each of which suits John Luther was the sole defendant. On November 28, 1898, judgment by default was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant in the first two suits for $175.-50 in the first and $226 in the second, together with costs and 10 per cent, interest. On November 25, 1898, a similar judgment was rendered in the other case for $147.75, with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bennitt v. Wilmington Star Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Palmer v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Tarleton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. Plumb v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Receivers v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Palestine v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Sandoval v. RattikinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Ex Parte FosterTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Miller v. DyessTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. McCollom v. DollarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API