Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Solomon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 22, 1995No. 94-1850PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the summary judgment under review as to possession of the real property in question, but reverse any finding of title in the appellees. We return this matter to the trial court for a trial on the issue of fraud in the execution of the document which purports to place title to the property in question in the appellee. See and compare Suris v. Tropical Fed. Savings & Loan Assoc., 515 So.2d 1049 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Forte v. Tripp & Skip, 339 So.2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, with directions.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Forte v. Tripp & SkripDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Suris v. Tropical Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Porras v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995