Legal Opinion

Zema v. Zema

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.) dated May 18, 2004, which denied her motion for an award of an attorney’s fee.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for an award of an attorney’s fee (see Mendenhall v Mendenhall, 4 AD3d 344 [2004]; Amodio v Amodio, 122 AD2d 757 [1986], affd 70 NY2d 5 [1987]) in light of the separate property which she retained, the marital property distributed to her, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Amodio v. AmodioNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Amodio v. AmodioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Mendenhall v. MendenhallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ciampa v. CiampaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Mesholam v. MesholamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API