Legal Opinion

Tarantini v. Russo Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to establish title to certain real property by adverse possession, the defendant Russo Realty Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated June 15, 1998, which denied its motion for leave to amend its answer to interpose as a fifth affirmative defense that the action seeks to deprive it of its rights in the property in violation of its substantive due process rights.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Motions for leave to amend pleadings are to be liberally granted absent prejudice or surprise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCaskey, Davies & Associates, Inc. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Norman v. FerraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Sentry Insurance v. Kero-Sun, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Alejandro v. RiportellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bomar v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Fucci v. Shellfish, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Aponte v. Brentwood Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Hinderstein v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API