Grob Bros. v. Secretary of War
United States Tax Court
1. The Renegotiation Act of 1942 is not proven to be unconstitutional. 2. The amount of excessive profits determined.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Van Fossan, Judge:
The constitutionality of the Eenegotiation Act was considered and discussed at length by this Court in Stein Brothers Manufacturing Co., 7 T. C. 863, and Ring Construction Corpora tion, 8 T. C. 1070. On the facts and arguments presented in those cases we held that the act is constitutional. In the case at bar the petitioner has challenged its constitutionality on several grounds, all of which were presented, considered, and discussed in Stein Brothers Manufacturing Co., supra, and Ring Construction Corporation, supra. The petitioner has suggested no new theories nor…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stein Bros. Mfg. Co. v. Secretary of WarUnited States Tax Court · 1946
- Ring Constr. Corp. v. Secretary of WarUnited States Tax Court · 1947
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nat'l Elec. Welding Machs. Co. v. StimsonUnited States Tax Court · 1948
- Greaves v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1948
- Moening v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1950
- Armstrong v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1950
- Pechtel v. United StatesUnited States Tax Court · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.