Legal Opinion

In re the City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Although the resolution of the Board of Estimate instituting this proceeding makes no mention of a marginal street to be acquired, the petition for' the order of condemnation specified that the acquisition was “ for the uses of a marginal street, wharf or place and for no other purposes whatsoever.” The City of New York urges that the proceeding was in fact brought solely to acquire title for improving the waterfront and harbor by a marginal street. However, the evidence shows that the proceeding contemplated the taking of greater rights than for a marginal street. It is our view that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of City of New York (Jamaica Bay)New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Vanneck Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Matter of City of New York (Exterior St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boynton v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API