Legal Opinion

Tenneco Oil Co. v. District Court of the Twentieth Judicial District

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1970No. 43910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

Petitioners seek in this original action a writ of prohibition against the respondent judge prohibiting him from exercising jurisdiction in a partition suit and for dissolution of a temporary injunction. The issue involved is the right of the trial court to partition oil and gas leases that have been previously unitized under an order of the Corporation Commission. We find the writ of prohibition should be granted.

In 1967, certain lease owners, including State Oil Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, agreed to unitize their oil and gas leases. They submitted a Plan…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Amis v. Bryan Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Wakefield v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Thomsen v. ThomsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Sweeney v. Bay State Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Prusa v. CermakSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gulfstream Petroleum Corp. v. LaydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Pifer v. McDermottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Come Big or Stay Home, LLC v. EOG Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Petro-Hunt v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Schulte v. Apache Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API