Legal Opinion
United States v. Winfield L. Roberts A/K/A Win
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 30, 1979No. 78-1428PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam 1
This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.
On consideration thereof It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause is hereby affirmed.
The duty of counsel is fully discharged without filing a suggestion for rehearing en banc unless the case meets the rigid standards of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a).
ORDER
3Per curiam 2
IT IS ORDERED, by the Court, sua sponte, that the Judgment previously entered in this proceeding on…
Also in this document: Per curiam 3.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Eddie Lee Alston A/K/A Eddie LeeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- State v. HendersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- United States v. Ivar Q. BlacknerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.