Legal Opinion

Hassall v. Murdock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner applied to the board of standards and appeals for a variance of the zoning ordinance on the ground of practical difficulties and unnecessary hardsMps in respect to property wMch she claimed could not be profitably adapted to a .conforming use. There was a claim that a permit had been obtained for the installation of a gasoline service station on tMs property before the zoning ordinance was changed to proMbit such use; and that excavations had been made and work done following the issuance of the permit and before the change in the ordinance. On tMs ground she claimed a “ vested…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Arseekay Syndicate, Inc. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Raskin v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Cirrito v. Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Matter of Noviak Holding Corporation v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Noviak Holding Corp. v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API