West, Weir & Bartel, Inc. v. Mary Carter Paint Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs and disbursements. Findings of fact, if any, inconsistent with the findings and conclusions herein stated are reversed and vacated. The over-all burden of proving damages was on plaintiff, including the burden of showing a fair and approximate estimate of the cost to be deducted from the gross commissions. (See Burke, Kuipers & Mahoney v. Dallas Dispatch Co., 253 App. Div. 206; see, also, Preager v. Unity Shoemakers Corp., 257 App. Div. 632; Slater *518v. Kane, 275 App. Div. 648; Allen, Heaton McDonald v. Castle Farm Amusement Co., 151 Ohio St. 522.)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allen, Heaton & McDonald, Inc. v. Castle Farm Amusement Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- Burke, Kuipers & Mahoney, Inc. v. Dallas Dispatch Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Preager v. Unity Shoemakers Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goldner v. DoknovitchAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976