Legal Opinion

West, Weir & Bartel, Inc. v. Mary Carter Paint Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs and disbursements. Findings of fact, if any, inconsistent with the findings and conclusions herein stated are reversed and vacated. The over-all burden of proving damages was on plaintiff, including the burden of showing a fair and approximate estimate of the cost to be deducted from the gross commissions. (See Burke, Kuipers & Mahoney v. Dallas Dispatch Co., 253 App. Div. 206; see, also, Preager v. Unity Shoemakers Corp., 257 App. Div. 632; Slater *518v. Kane, 275 App. Div. 648; Allen, Heaton McDonald v. Castle Farm Amusement Co., 151 Ohio St. 522.)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen, Heaton & McDonald, Inc. v. Castle Farm Amusement Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Burke, Kuipers & Mahoney, Inc. v. Dallas Dispatch Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Preager v. Unity Shoemakers Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldner v. DoknovitchAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API