Legal Opinion

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Gruy

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided September 17, 1986No. 04-85-00188-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REEVES, Justice.

This is an appeal from a jury trial resulting in a judgment cancelling the deep well drilling rights of a lessee oil company due to its failure to develop its leasehold below 3,750 feet.

Appellees, Joseph Gruy, Jr., Viggo Gruy, and Dagmar Gruy Cole (Gruys) are the beneficial owners of the original lessor’s interest under two leases (hereinafter referred to as “C” and “D” leases). Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) is a successor to the original lessee of the lease from depths below 3,750 feet, it having assigned its interest in the lease above that depth.

The original…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Clifton v. KoontzTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sun Exploration and Production Co. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Pickens v. Hope, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  4. Sun Exploration & Production Co. v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  5. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API