Legal Opinion · Dissent

Styles v. Dennard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1958No. 37048Published

1Dissent

Felton, Chief Judge, and Gardner, Presiding Judge,

dissenting. We concur in the judgment as to Thomas L. Griggs, but we dissent from the judgment of reversal as to James Dennard. Thomas was a special agent of James Dennard for one purpose, namely, to operate for Dennard a specified, identified, registered and marked taxicab. The actual authority of Thomas to do so is undisputed. As we see the case Thomas’ apparent authority went no further. Dennard put Thomas in possession of Den*643nard’s authorized and registered cab. Such possession was indicative of his authority to operate that particular cab…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jewell v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API