Gilbert v. Dodge
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
These two actions, by different plaintiffs, are against the same defendant. Each original declaration consisted of a single count. Allegation was, in substance, that executory promises, made by the defendant to induce the purchase by the plaintiff of shares of the capital stock of a fertilizer company, had been broken, loss resulting. The statements, even if untrue, would not afford basis for tort for deceit.
General demurrers were sustained.
The respective plaintiffs amended, by leave of court, by adding a new count. The amendments were allowed, against objection by the defendant, who saved…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Wildes v. Pens Unlimited Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Smith v. PopeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
- Chapman v. GannettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Stewart v. WinterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Kennebunk, Kennebunkport & Wells Water District v. Maine Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.