Legal Opinion
Witzel v. Berman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Equity. Suit.by Charles J. Witzel and the Englander Spring Bed Company against Barnet Berman. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
This is one of those simple inventions in which a correct determination depends partly upon a close analysis of the prior art and partly upon a'cquiring now the mind and eyes of the artisan as he looked upon the problem before it was solved.
The suit is for infringement of reissued letters patent No. 13,125 granted to Charles J. Witzel, June 28, 1910; the-original patent having been granted May 11, 1909, and reissue applied for on June 12, 1909. Complainants charge the infringement of ten claims (7, 10, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24).
The subject-matter is an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rajah Auto Supply Co. v. Emil Grossman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
3Cited by1 opinion
- Witzel v. Butler Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915