Legal Opinion

Cleu v. Board of Police Commissioners

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1906No. Civ. No. 149PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. P. Y. Long, City Attorney, W. G. Burke, City Attorney, and A. S. Newburgh, Assistant City Attorney, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment vacating and annulling the proceedings of the defendants, the board of police commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco, removing plaintiff from his position as a policeman of said city and county.

Upon the petition of plaintiff a writ of review was issued to the board of police commissioners, to which they made return; from which and the petition it appears that the said board had adopted a rule that ‘ ‘ any member of the police department, neglecting to pay any debt owing by him, shall, on complaint by one of his creditors, be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Flanagan v. Board of Police CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. People Ex Rel. Donovan v. Board of Fire CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pasadena Police Officers Assn. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Donovan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. McCain v. SheridanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Ludolph v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Perez v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API