Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Colonresto v. Good Samaritan Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 1987Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Eiber, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to affirm the order appealed from, in the following memorandum in which Thompson, J. P., concurs. This appeal presents an attempt by the plaintiffs to salvage a medical malpractice action against a physician by invoking the continuous treatment doctrine to toll the Statute of Limitations.

The present record discloses that the plaintiff Hilda Colonresto consulted with the defendant, Dr. Juan Carlos Pellín, on February 16, 1982. Dr. Pellín, who is not a surgeon, concluded that the patient was in need of surgery and, therefore, immediately…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API