Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Marshall v. Roesch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

The relator, who is one of the commissioners of the State Industrial Accident Commission, filed his affidavit and petition in the Circuit Court of Union County asking that an order be issued directing the defendant to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt. Thereafter such proceedings were had that the defendant appeared and answered to the charge. The' court overruled a demurrer to the answer and gave the relator twenty days in which to reply. The relator failed to reply, and thereupon both parties moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court sustained the defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bayer v. BayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Anderson v. McVannellMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Kauri v. MessnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StukeyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Campos v. Garden City Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., Ltd. of London v. Portland Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  4. Hollopeter v. PalmOregon Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API