Legal Opinion

Vaughn Flying Service, Inc. v. Costanza

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided August 3, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-2685PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

SHAW, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of the intervenor, the United States of America, to dismiss the plaintiff’s petition for garnishment. Vaughn Flying Service, Inc. filed the petition in state court to enforce a judgment obtained earlier against Paul Costanza. The garnishment is directed to approximately $8,000 on deposit for the benefit of Costanza in a supervised Farmer’s Home Administration (FHA) account in the American Bank & Trust Company in Opelousas. The United States intervened on the behalf of the FHA, claiming a superior interest in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. Johnston v. Morehouse Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Succession of LanauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  5. Bethard v. State, Through Bd. of TrusteesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank of Coushatta v. PatrickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Cottonport Bank v. RoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Cottonport Bank v. Roy (In Re Roy)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API