In re the Application of the City of New York, Acting by & Through the Commissioner of Docks, Relative to Acquiring Right & Title to & Possession of Certain Real Property, Lands, Lands under Water & Lands under Water Filled in, Not Now Owned by the City of New York, Situated Along the Westerly & Northerly Shores of Jamaica Bay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
There are two valid reasons why the order from which the appeal is taken should be affirmed, in the manner hereinafter indicated:(1) The title to the lands under water, part of premises for which an award was made to claimant, was involved in very serious doubt at the time of the commencement of the proceeding:(a) Was the title in the town of Flatlands, the predecessor of the city of New York, as held by Blackmar, J., at a Trial Part and confirmed by Carr, J., in the opinion in Dickens v. City of New York (175 App. Div. 568); as strongly suggested by Willard Bartlett, J., in Denton v. Bennett…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of City of New York (Jamaica Bay)New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Jordan v. . VolkenningNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Rockaway Park Improvement Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Bergen Beach Land Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1920
- Mevius v. Tiffin Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re GillespieNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938