Legal Opinion

United States v. Jennifer Juliet Gatling

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 8, 1996No. 95-3064, 95-3074PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALD, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Jennifer Gatling (“Gatling”) and appellant Cheryl Walker (‘Walker”) were each convicted of conspiracy to commit bribery in regard to the illegal issuance of section 8 subsidies through the Section 8 Division of the District of Columbia’s Department of Public and Assisted Housing (“DPAH”). Walker was also convicted of one count of making false statements while Gatling was also convicted of four counts of bribery. Appellants raise various challenges to their convictions here, arguing in the main that there was insufficient evidence to support their conspiracy…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. United States v. Fraser VerrusioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Wilson, Ralph T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Opio MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Carson, SamuelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Dwayne A. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API