Legal Opinion

Cannon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 16, 2016No. CASE NO. 1D16-93PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinsor, J.

In this appeal, we must determine what happens when a defendant alleges she discovered facts undermining her judge’s impartiality only after the judge denied her postconviction motion. Although the rules of criminal procedure provide no direct answer, Florida Supreme Court precedent allows a defendant in this circumstance to file a successive rule 3.850 motion. We therefore reverse the order on appeal, and we remand so that the tidal court can treat the motion to set aside as a rule 3.850 motion.

I

Michael Ufferman represented Appellant Dana Cannon in her postconviction proceeding, with Judge…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. Kimbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Dana S. Cannon v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Duncan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. St. Fabre v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API