Legal Opinion

Biery v. Steckel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1902No. Appeal, No. 259PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 259, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Lehigh Co., Jan. T. 1898, No. 132, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in case of James S. Biery, Trustee of Elizabeth P. Steckel, v. Edmund F. Steckel. Exceptions to report of John Rupp, Esq., auditor. The court dismissed the exceptions. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report distributing fund raised by sheriff’s sale.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

A single question is involved in this case, but, in order to *397bring it clearly before us, it will be well to recite the facts somewhat fully.

Defendant entered into articles of separation from his wife, duly executed, in which it is stipulated: “ The said Dr. Edmund F. Steckel, for himself, his heirs, executors and administrators, hereby covenants and agrees to and with James S. Biery, Esq., Trustee for Elizabeth P. Steckel, that he will pay to the said Trustee, for the use of his wife and his minor daughter, Mabel, the sum of three hundred dollars per year, payable in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Biery v. SteckelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Auerbach v. Corn Exchange Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Zlotziver v. ZlotziverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API