Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pacific Americana Fisheries v. Darwin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1914No. 11815PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court January 23, 1914, for a writ of mandamus to compel the performance of duties by the state fish commissioner.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandamus. The affidavit on which the application for the writ is founded, is as follows:

“E. S. McCord, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says:
“I. That he is a member of the firm of Kerr & McCord, attorneys for the petitioners above named; that he makes this affidavit and application for a writ of mandamus and prohibition for and on behalf of said petitioners.
“II. That Lester H. Darwin is now, and at all the times hereinafter mentioned has been, the duly appointed, qualified and acting fish commissioner of the state of Washington, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Hawes v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Westhues v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. SEIU HEALTHCARE 775NW v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. SEIU Healthcare 775NW v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Beem v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API