Legal Opinion

Ace Importing Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 12, 1966No. C.D. 2651PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Nao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise covered by the protests ©numerated in the schedule of protests, attached to this decision and made a part hereof, consists of battery-operated lanterns which were assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem, or at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem, or at the rate of 18 per centum ad valorem, or at the rate of 17 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provision in paragraph 339 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, or by the Torquay Protocol to said General…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Enlite Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API