Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Coleman
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND THEIR COMPLAINT
KEITH, Chief Judge.
The federal defendants have moved, in a motion joined in by the state and municipal defendants, to dismiss the action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Briefs, supplemental briefs,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lau v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- George A. Lloyd and Janet B. Wolfe, Etc. v. The Regional Transportation Authority and the Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United Handicapped Federation v. AndreDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
3Cited by13 opinions
- Miener v. State Of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Patton Ex Rel. Lewis v. DumpsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Pushkin v. Regents of the University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- William Baker v. Dean BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Whitaker v. Board of Higher Ed. of City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.