Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Bonnet

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2008No. 48250PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Robert L. Brooks instituted a district court action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief with respect to a strip of land owned by respondents Robert and Angela Bonnet, on which he had built a driveway. At issue in this case is whether Brooks possessed an express easement, easement by necessity, or residual easement over that strip of land. We conclude that Brooks did not possess an easement and therefore was not entitled to the declaratory or injunctive relief that he sought.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Originally, the two pieces of land involved in this dispute were part…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Gillmor v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Missoula v. MixMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Beebe v. SwerdaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Cox v. Glenbrook CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Las Vegas v. Cliff Shadows Professional Plaza, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API