Legal Opinion

Watson v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 26, 1931No. Docket No. 33307Published

Under the facts and circumstances here the practical effect of the things done constituted a sale of the petitioner's properties for tax purposes, irrespective of a so-called "lease and option agreement" entered into purporting to lease said properties for a term of months with an option to purchase upon expiration of the term for the nominal sum of $1.

1Opinion of the Court

A. B. WATSON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Watson v. Commissioner

Docket No. 33307.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

24 B.T.A. 466; 1931 BTA LEXIS 1638;

October 26, 1931, Promulgated

Under the facts and circumstances here the practical effect of the things done constituted a sale of the petitioner's properties for tax purposes, irrespective of a so-called "lease and option agreement" entered into purporting to lease said properties for a term of months with an option to purchase upon expiration of the term for the nominal sum of $1.

Warren Libby, Esq., for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Watson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API