Commonwealth v. Bullock
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MONTEMURO, J.:
¶ 1 This case presents an issue of first impression challenging the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s fetal homicide statute, the Crimes Against the Unborn Child Act, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 2601 et seq. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
¶ 2 On January 6, 2003, Appellant Matthew Bullock, accompanied by his father, arrived at the Wilkes-Barre City Police Department and informed the officer at the front window that he had strangled his girlfriend, Lisa Hargrave, at his apartment, and gave police a key to the residence. Officers discovered the decomposed body of Ms.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. SierraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VenturaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. RadeckiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. LamondaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. HochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.