Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. City of Pittsburgh
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 23, 1987No. 85-3607PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from a class action brought by a group of recovering alcoholics to enjoin the closing of alcoholic treatment centers by the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Alcoholic Recovery Center, Inc. (“ARC”), the non-profit corporation that manages and runs the treatment centers that treat class action plaintiffs-appellees, intervened in the action before the district court. The City now appeals the grant of the preliminary injunction enjoining it pendente lite from closing the treatment centers and requiring it to issue zoning and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Morton v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Seneca Resources Corp. v. Township of HighlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Oxford House, Inc. v. Township of Cherry HillDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Donohue v. ManganoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Morton v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.