Legal Opinion

Martin v. Astin

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1927No. 958-4774PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

We adopt the statement of the case as made by the Court of Civil Appeals (289 S. W. 442), which is as follows:

“Suit by J. D. Astin, appellant, against A. Martin and others, appellees, to recover 138 acres of land in Lee county. Trial to jury. Judgment for appellees on directed verdict.
“M. N. Martin, the mother of appellee, A. Martin, is common source of title. Appellant claims under an execution sale foreclosing an abstract of judgment lien under a judgment in favor of Lee County State Bank of Lexington, Tex., against M. N. Martin. The judgment was recovered April 20, 1923. An abstract of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stallings v. HullumTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lester v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Campbell v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Ranney v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Astin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re O.J. OSBORN and Roma Lou Osborn, Debtors. O.J. OSBORN and Roma Lou Osborn, Appellants, v. DURANT BANK & TRUST COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Andrews Et Ux. v. SEC. Bank of W. F.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Thomas v. CreagerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Logan v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Lummus v. Alma State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API