Legal Opinion
Hutkoff v. Winmar Realty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 6, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
This controversy depends upon the construction of certain provisions of the last will- and testament of Nathan Hutkoff, deceased. Hutkoff, at his decease, was seized of certain real estate in the borough of Manhattan, New York city. He died November 20, 1917, a resident of the county of New York, leaving a last will and testament, which was duly admitted to probate in the Surrogate’s Court of said county, and the plaintiffs duly qualified as the executors and trustees named in said will. The will, after making several charitable and other specific bequests, left the rest, residue…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crittenden v. . FairchildNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Bruner v. . MeigsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Van Cott v. Van CottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Van Cott v. . Van CottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re the Estate of OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re the Construction of the Will of JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In re the Construction of the Will of McLaughlinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
- Jandorf v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- In re the Petition of BarthenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.