Legal Opinion
Peluso v. Kasun
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 2010PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Ebrahimoff, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated July 30, 2009, as, without a hearing, granted the mother’s petition to modify a prior order of visitation of the same court dated July 25, 2006, so as to direct that the father have only therapeutic supervised visitation.
Ordered that the order dated July 30, 2009, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
“In general, an evidentiary hearing is necessary regarding *951modification of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hom v. ZulloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Perez v. SepulvedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Flangos v. FlangosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by8 opinions
- James M. v. Kevin M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Feldman v. FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Aquino v. AntongiorgiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Lew v. LewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Ciara B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.