Fletcher v. Armour Fertilizer Works
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Tifton — Judge R. Eve. September 18, 1915-
1Opinion of the CourtBkoyles, J.
1. '“The provisions of section 1794 of the Civil Code do not extend to the tagging of commercial fertilizers. Under the terms of this section a sale of commercial fertilizer which has not been analyzed -as evidenced by its registration is illegal, and any contract made in pursuance of such a sale is void, but a sale of fertilizer without the tags which are required to be purchased in order that the State may secure its revenue therefrom is not necessarily illegal; nor is a note given for fertilizer void for the sole reason that the tags were not attached to the sacks.” Hillis v. Comer, 13 Ga.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Toole v. Wiregrass Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Hillis v. Comer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Chilivis v. ROGERS OIL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Chilivis v. ROGERS OIL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975