Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. Armour Fertilizer Works

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 19, 1916No. 6941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Tifton — Judge R. Eve. September 18, 1915-

1Opinion of the CourtBkoyles, J.

1. '“The provisions of section 1794 of the Civil Code do not extend to the tagging of commercial fertilizers. Under the terms of this section a sale of commercial fertilizer which has not been analyzed -as evidenced by its registration is illegal, and any contract made in pursuance of such a sale is void, but a sale of fertilizer without the tags which are required to be purchased in order that the State may secure its revenue therefrom is not necessarily illegal; nor is a note given for fertilizer void for the sole reason that the tags were not attached to the sacks.” Hillis v. Comer, 13 Ga.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Toole v. Wiregrass Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Hillis v. Comer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Chilivis v. ROGERS OIL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Chilivis v. ROGERS OIL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API