Legal Opinion

Elliott v. City of N.Y.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 20, 2012No. 10-4925-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

10-4925-cv Elliott v. City of N.Y. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Iodice v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Stormes v. United Water New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Miller v. MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API