Legal Opinion

Van Winkle Gin & Machine Works v. Pittman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 4, 1907No. 318Published

Complaint, from city court of Jefferson — Judge Stark. October 11, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

This was a suit on a promissory note. The petition alleged, that the plaintiff was a corporation; that the defendants were jointly and severally indebted-to it in the amount of the-note made and delivered to it by the defendants; and that written notice had been duly served on the defendants of an intention to sue-The defendants filed a joint answer. They denied that plaintiff' was a corporation under the laws of Georgia. They denied that any written notice was served on them, as required by law, of an intention to sue. They admitted the execution of the note sued on. They further answered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Abel v. Jarratt & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Phœnix Insurance v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Fisher v. George S. Jones Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Dorough v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Taylor v. CloudSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API