State v. Long, 21771 (9-28-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Arthur Long appeals from his conviction and sentence on one count of Felonious Assault. Long challenges the trial court's decision denying his motions for a mistrial and for a new trial, claiming that the State improperly used grand jury testimony during cross-examination and that the State failed to turn over exculpatory evidence. Second, Long insists that the State should not have been allowed to call an expert as a rebuttal witness. Finally, he argues that his conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence and that there is insufficient evidence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.