Legal Opinion

State v. Long, 21771 (9-28-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2007No. 21771Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Arthur Long appeals from his conviction and sentence on one count of Felonious Assault. Long challenges the trial court's decision denying his motions for a mistrial and for a new trial, claiming that the State improperly used grand jury testimony during cross-examination and that the State failed to turn over exculpatory evidence. Second, Long insists that the State should not have been allowed to call an expert as a rebuttal witness. Finally, he argues that his conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence and that there is insufficient evidence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API