Legal Opinion

In re Madigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 7, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1986 and resides in the City of Binghamton, Broome County.

We grant petitioner’s motion to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys on the ground that he ceased to be an attorney on June 23, 2006, upon his conviction by a plea of guilty in the County Court of Broome County to the crime of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 (3) (a) (i), a class E felony (see Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a], [b]; Matter of Weitz, 12 AD3d 773 [2004]). Respondent has not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WeitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re MadiganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API