Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Lane Construction Corporation

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 15, 1963No. 1171PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

The shock waves of a blasting operation, travelling through air and ground, damaged the plaintiffs’ dwelling house, according to their writ. The defendant construction company is named as the responsible agency, but its acts are not condemned as wrongful or negligent.

Although the actual blasting took place off the plaintiffs’ property, their complaint sounds in trespass. At common law, this form of action required no allegation of negligence in the defendant. Also, it had particular application to injury to real estate.

The substance of the defendant’s argument in contending that the complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Dean Thompson v. Green Mountain Power CorpSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  3. Ploof v. PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  4. Griswold v. Town School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  5. Goupiel v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mobbs v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Dyer v. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  3. Laughon & Johnson, Inc. v. BurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  4. Bosley v. Central Vermont Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  5. Wright v. NasalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API