Legal Opinion
Petersen v. US Airways
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided November 19, 2013No. SUCV201203737BLS1Published
1Opinion of the Court
Billings, Thomas R, J.
All defendants have moved to dismiss all counts against them in these two consolidated actions, as failing to state a claim. For the following reasons, all defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are ALLOWED as to claims asserted under G.L.c. 93A, and are otherwise DENIED.
ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINTS
The following are summaries of the allegations in the two complaints, whish are for present purposes assumed to be true.
A. The Petersen Complaint
The Petersen plaintiffs are twenty-six individuals resident in several American states (including one in Massachusetts), the District of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Schaer v. Brandeis UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc. v. Checkers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Business Incentives, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.