Erb v. Huston
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the Common Pleas of Lancaster county. This was an amicable action by Thomas Huston v. Isaac Erb, to November Term, 1851, and depending on the following facts. Certain real estate belonging to the estate of Michael Brenneman was, in 1813, accepted by Michael Brenneman, one of the sons of the said deceased, at the valuation of f>18,560.28§-, made in proceedings in partition in the Common Pleas of Lancaster county.
Read the full summary
Error to the Common Pleas of Lancaster county. This was an amicable action by Thomas Huston v. Isaac Erb, to November Term, 1851, and depending on the following facts. Certain real estate belonging to the estate of Michael Brenneman was, in 1813, accepted by Michael Brenneman, one of the sons of the said deceased, at the valuation of f>18,560.28§-, made in proceedings in partition in the Common Pleas of Lancaster county. Jacob Brenneman, the decedent, left a widow and jive children. The widow was entitled to the interest of one-third part of the valuation, viz., of $6186.76. The widow…
1Per curiam
Upon a careful consideration of all that has been urged against the conclusions of the Court below, we regard them as sound, and affirm the judgment for the reasons given by the judge who tried the cause.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hollenberger v. Yaukey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1891
- Smith v. DanielsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Dull v. SlaterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Baldwin v. SinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901