Legal Opinion

State v. Recio-Arecibia

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1987No. C8-86-1815PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONE, Judge.

This appeal is from a pretrial order suppressing a statement made by the respondent during in-custody interrogation conducted through an interpreter. The State appeals, claiming suppression was erroneous and will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial. State v. Webber, 262 N.W.2d 157, 159 (Minn.1977). We find no showing of critical impact and affirm the trial court.

FACTS

Respondent Maximo Recio-Arecibia was arrested on August 14, 1987 and charged with second-degree criminal sexual conduct for alleged sexual contact with a female under the age of 13. See…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RonnebaumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. RonnebaumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API