Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Robert Wheeler

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1977No. 76-1509PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question whether Indian tribal courts and federal district courts are “arms of different sovereigns” for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. 1 We hold that they are not arms of separate sovereigns and, therefore, that an individual cannot be tried for the same offense before both an Indian tribal court and a court of the United States Government. Furthermore, we hold that the guarantee against double jeopardy has been violated in this case.

The defendant, a Navajo Indian, plead guilty in Navajo tribal court on October 18, 1974 to charges of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. MorganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. United States v. John Walking CrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Sánchez ValleSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2015
  5. Gastelum v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API