United States v. Anthony Robert Wheeler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question whether Indian tribal courts and federal district courts are “arms of different sovereigns” for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. 1 We hold that they are not arms of separate sovereigns and, therefore, that an individual cannot be tried for the same offense before both an Indian tribal court and a court of the United States Government. Furthermore, we hold that the guarantee against double jeopardy has been violated in this case.
The defendant, a Navajo Indian, plead guilty in Navajo tribal court on October 18, 1974 to charges of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. MorganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- United States v. John Walking CrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Sánchez ValleSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2015
- Gastelum v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.