P. C. &. St. L. R'y. Co. v. Board of Public Works
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SnydeR, Judge:
The Pittsburg, Cincinnati and St. Louis Railway Company in the year 1885, under the provisions of ch. 52 Acts 1888, made a return of its property subject to taxatiou in this *265State to the Auditor, who laid the same before the board of public works. The return fixed the total value of said property in the county of Brooke at $109,720.00. The board of public works deeming said return unsatisfactory proceeded to ascertain the value of said property and fixed the value thereof in said county at $424,720.00. This increased valuation was made by adding to the $109,720.00, returned by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Auditor of State v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- McClure v. MaitlandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- San Jose Gas Co. v. JanuaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Republic Life Insurance v. PollakIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Turner v. AlthausNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Upshur County v. RichSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Sims v. FisherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
- Charleston & S. Bridge Co. v. Kanawha County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Richmond v. HendersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.